Today we'll keep it light and listen to some music. We've previously covered Army of Lovers, and today the theme is ABBA.
Where the silence gives room to the thoughts that would otherwise drown in the noise of outside life
Showing posts with label colonialism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label colonialism. Show all posts
03 December 2014
ABBA mania?
Today we'll keep it light and listen to some music. We've previously covered Army of Lovers, and today the theme is ABBA.
Labels:
ABBA,
Africa,
colonialism,
discrimination,
English,
freedom,
history,
human rights,
music,
party,
political persecution,
politics,
Russia,
society,
songs,
Sweden,
war
12 June 2013
Being Foreign in a Country That Doesn't Know How to Deal With Foreigners
The Danish relationship with Everything Not Danish can at times be strained, to say the least. We all blame the weirdo right-wingers for saying absurd and maybe even racist things, but somehow seem to miss that it's not just the weirdo politicians. It's all of us, and a lot (too much) of the time. The latest thing around Aarhus appears to be that Eastern Europeans aren't let into nightclubs, solely on the basis of being Lithuanian, Bulgarian or whatever. Some of the people affected are furious, while others pull the ”it's private property so who cares and I'll just go somewhere else” argument, (even though there are some convincing arguments that it might be illegal. I don't know the giurispudence, but I'm fairly sure this particular way of discriminating guests won't hold in court.) But this is just the latest example of often tiny things that make people feel not welcome. How does it feel to be foreign in a country that does not know how to deal with foreigners and would rather have them go away so as not to think about them?
Labels:
aliens,
anthropology,
Barcelona,
colonialism,
criminals,
Denmark,
discrimination,
English,
ethnic minority,
exclusionary practices,
integration,
labour market,
language,
minorities,
passport,
society,
violence
10 April 2013
Society Against the State
In 1648 a bunch of guys
sat down and decided that the best way to end wars of religion would
be to create
states.
Sovereign states with sovereign rulers, and what happened inside those
states was no one's business but the rulers'. People eventually
stopped warring over religion, at least in Europe – they started
warring “internationally” instead, as states became nations
and saw in themselves something intrinsically unique to their
respective nations that must be defended at all costs.
Bloodshed
ensued.
Within the last 100 years the entire planet has been fitted into a
neat pattern of nations, states, nation states, term it as you
please, nice coloured spaces on the map, characterised by their
internal affairs being nobody's business but their own. It is seen as a result
of 'development', as something inevitable, as all societies must
eventually progress towards having a State, and this is a Good Thing.
While we're at last shedding some of the “my genocide is nobody's business but my own”
thinking,
and people are also beginning to get a grip of why “everybody must
develop so as to be as civilised as us” may be deemed
offensive,
that a state should be inevitable is not so easily forgotten.
Historians and other clever people sought out evidence in the sources
of history to show why all peoples must eventually develop state
structures in order to govern themselves, as not having a ruling
power is equal to being Neanderthals, to paraphrase only slightly.
Which brings me to what I want to present to you today. Is the State
inevitable?
Labels:
anthropology,
Clastres,
colonialism,
economy,
English,
gender relations,
high heels,
human rights,
law,
maps,
politics,
power,
revolution,
science,
society,
statelessness,
states,
symbolic violence,
violence,
world
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)